Dear People,
It might not always be easy to separate genuine information from misinformation. One has to be extra careful, when a magazine is dedicated to matters of soul and spirit.
Even though Dr Villoldo's diagnosis of 'loss of soul' seems accurate enough, his attempt to place this in a hisdtorical context is full of errors that could have easily been avoided in a time, living now, where Google and Wikipedia, could have been consulted in the blink o an eye...
212 AD:All male inhabitants in the provinces of the Roman Emopire receive equal citizenship, slaves excepted.
313 AD: Chistianity was given equal rights to paganism
391 AD: The Christian Religion becomes State Religion; Paganism forbidden.

1545 -1563 Tridentine (not Vatican) Council:
Souls of women or american indians were not an issue
1542 Laws issued in Spain to protect the human rights of the Indians under Spanish Jurisdiction
1550 'Great Debate' between the priest Las Casas and the Jurist Juan Gines de Sepulveda, not whether Indians had a soul, but whether they had the same rights as European Christians...

There is no logic in assuming that Indians don't have a Soul and sending missionaries to the Indies to save the very souls they were not supposed to have!

Destcartes: He didn't live two centuries after the Tridentine Coouncil, but died less than a century after it.(1596-1650)
His 'I Think - I Am' was in the first place a recognition, that I myself am the one who is in charge of the activity of thinking, which is a spiritual activity, experienced and mediated by the soul.
In his time this was not taken for granted and even now, a lot of people don't really think their own thought, but rather think other peoples thoughts or slogans etc...
Only when he turned it into a syllogism: 'I Think, therefore I Am' it became a form of reasoning that led him into the problem of how to prove that anything else outside himself exists with the same certainty. Hence his difficulty with the idea that animals would have a soul. Only, La Mettrie, in 18th Century came up with the idea that the human himself might be a machine.

Descartes works were put on the Index of forbidden books, which means that at least catholics would not have been exposed so much to his ideas, so that this hardly counts as the beginning of loss of soul.

Such misinformation and lack of logic is rather unfortunate, because it makes me now think, what else of what Dr Villoldo is writing might be equally inaccurate.

The more spiritual one wants to be, the more grounded one needs to be. The paradox might be, that we lost our soul when we lost our body, when there was no 'acounting' anymore for what could not be measured, weighed or counted, in other words, when all sensory qualities of the world were considered secondary qualiies of the world, i.e. 'deemed to be subjective',except what can be touched. i.e. 'objective'.
Anyhow. This would be a whole and important field of inquiry.

But, please, Living Now,make sure that the information provided is as accurate as possible. No easy shortcuts.
Thanks.
Henk Bak
Historian and Philosopher.